There's a decent integrated password manager that can be encrypted, although KWallet integration is a worthy extension, and the application supports native Linux and KDE notifications. Different sets of configuration options can be saved as a profile, and there are dozens of separate options for changing how both the tab bar and the URL bar work, as well as how downloads are handled. It installs with DuckDuckGo as the default search engine, and Adblock is installed and enabled when you dive into the configuration menus. But Falkon also has the option of looking like Chrome, and this may be especially useful if you're using a different desktop and would like some of Falkon's other features.Īs you might anticipate, with Falkon now being a fully fledged KDE application, its main feature is that there are so many things you can change about the application. With Chromium, there's the added complexity of it using its own window decoration, as well as all the non-conforming settings pages and tab manipulation. This is the main problem with browsers like Chromium and Firefox, because even when there are matching themes for your KDE look, such as Arc Dark, the simple differences that come about from using different toolkits mean that it's almost impossible to make the browsers look completely integrated with your desktop. If you're a KDE user, the first thing you'll appreciate is that Falkon completely respects your theme settings. That rebranding is Falkon, and this is the first release, hence the 3.0 release tag (coming after QupZilla 2.2). QupZilla became an official KDE project with the release of 2.2 in late 2017, and this positioning left the project ripe for a rebranding as it become an integral part of the KDE desktop. It was formally QupZilla, a highly-regarded Qt-based web browser that was popular with KDE users (and us, as we looked at QupZilla in previous issues). Like Phoenix that became Firefox from Netscape, Falkon is a new browser with old roots. We keep covering qutebrowser, for instance, because of its unique functionality, and Falkon is another worthy candidate. But Firefox isn't the only open source web browser. The recent major enhancements to Firefox are a good example, as Firefox is now defining its own terms for the web it wants to see – and that's something we can all support. And that's a good thing to do, because competition can help even the largest megacorp do the right thing. Fortunately, and quite unlike 15 years ago, all the major browsers have a major open source component, which means they can be ratified, forked, and expanded if necessary. If we're going to take back the web from the companies that are now defining what it has become, we need to own the browser.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |